He defends himself by saying that he was speaking hypothetically, to make a point, and points out that he does reject the hypothesis afterwards. And I can sort of buy that.
But this dude should get fired just for being a moron.
Let's see if some other hypotheses that he could have used would have sounded better:
- "If you wanted to reduce racism, you could -- if that were your sole purpose -- you could abort every white baby in this country and your racism rate would go down..."
- "If you wanted to reduce the amount of crooked lawyers, you could -- if that were your sole purpose -- you could abort every Jewish baby in this country and your crooked lawyer rate would go down..."
- "If you wanted to reduce terrorism, you could -- if that were your sole purpose -- you could abort every Islamic baby in this country and your terrorism rate would go down..."
Naahh... none of these sound too good, either....