Well, just after I started talking about politicians saying & doing what they want, and We won't do nuthin about it, here comes William Bennett and his lil' comment.
He defends himself by saying that he was speaking hypothetically, to make a point, and points out that he does reject the hypothesis afterwards. And I can sort of buy that.
But this dude should get fired just for being a moron.
Let's see if some other hypotheses that he could have used would have sounded better:
- "If you wanted to reduce racism, you could -- if that were your sole purpose -- you could abort every white baby in this country and your racism rate would go down..."
- "If you wanted to reduce the amount of crooked lawyers, you could -- if that were your sole purpose -- you could abort every Jewish baby in this country and your crooked lawyer rate would go down..."
- "If you wanted to reduce terrorism, you could -- if that were your sole purpose -- you could abort every Islamic baby in this country and your terrorism rate would go down..."
Naahh... none of these sound too good, either....